Legal Opinion

Crittenden v. City of Mt. Clemens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Macomb. (Canfield, J.) Assumpsit for taxes paid under protest. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action is brought, to recover the sum of §133.01, being the amount of taxes -assessed upon personal property paid by the plaintiff to the collector of the city of Mt. Clemens under compulsion of law, and under protest, which reads as follows:

“I hereby protest against the collection of or payment by me of the taxes spread upon the. tax roll of the city of Mt. Clemens (Third ward) for the year 1889, for the following reasons:
“First. I am not a resident and was not a resident of said ward at the time of the pretended- assessment or levy of said tax, but was an inhabitant of and voter in the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitney v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. National Bank of Boaz v. Marshall CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Mason v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API