Wiltz v. Esso Standard Oil Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Judge.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment dismissing his suit in the District Court on an exception of no cause of action. The petition reflects that recovery is sought in tort for damages allegedly sustained by plaintiff from his contracting tuberculosis while acting in the course of his employment with the defendant company.1
The pertinent provisions of the petition for the purpose of consideration of the exception are Articles 2 through 6, which
"2.
"Petitioner, while employed for defendant as a mechanic's helper and pipe fitter's helper contracted, tuberculosis as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. Hackley, Hume & JoyceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Weadock v. Eagle Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
- Honeycutt v. CarverLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
- Burmaster v. Texas Pacific-Missouri Pacific Terminal R. R. of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eschmann v. MoyerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
- Lewis MacHine & Welding Serv. v. Amite Ready Mix Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- First National Bank of Lafayette v. Francis I. Dupont & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Favret v. OursoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973