State v. Hackley, Hume & Joyce
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Twenty-Fifth Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa; Clay Elliott, Judge. Action by the State against Hackley, 1-Iume & Joyce. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
MONROE, J.
The state having brought this suit for the recovery of certain lands in the parish of Tangipahoa, the defendants excepted, on the grounds that the petition discloses no cause of action, and that the state has made no tender of the price and of the taxes collected by it, with interest thereon. The exception of no cause of action was. maintained, and the state appeals from a judgment dismissing the suit. Defendants answer the appeal and pray that, should the court not find the exception of no cause of action good, it maintain the exception of want of tender, and…
2Cited by45 opinions
- Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Bender v. ChewSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Tremont Lumber Co. v. MaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Godchaux v. HydeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.