Legal Opinion
Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1934No. 4755PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TALIAFERRO, Judge.
Plaintiff sued his employer, Milner-Fuller, Incorporated, and its insurer, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, for compensation alleged to be due him for injuries received by him while performing the duties of his employment. He alleges that during the year 1932, and until January 6, 1933, he was employed by Milner-Fuller, Incorporated, in its garage in the city of Monroe, La., as a mechanic and painter, and that among the other duties of his employment he was required to make repairs on automobiles, and to apply lacquers and paints and other kindred solutions on them…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shipp v. BordelonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Pierre v. BarringerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Dewey v. Lutcher-Moore Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Stockstill v. Sears-Roebuck & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Tarver v. QuinnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Atchison v. MaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- O'REGAN v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Eames v. Alexandria Contracting Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Searcy v. NovoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.