Legal Opinion

Morrill v. Morrill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1904No. Docket No. 53PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from Van Burén; Carr, J. Bill by Frank E. Morrill against Cora Morrill to restrain the removal of certain crops. Defendant filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill, asking for the appointment of a receiver and for an accounting. From a decree for defendant, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

The parties to this suit are husband and wife. They were married about 13 years ago. In December, 1901, they separated, and shortly afterward defendant filed a bill for divorce, which, upon a hearing, was dismissed. They own 80 acres of land as tenants by the entirety, upon which, in 1903, complainant had a crop of grapes. Defendant undertook to harvest this crop. Complainant filed this bill to enjoin such action. Defendant filed a cross-bill averring that she contributed the money *113for the purchase of this property under a verbal agreement that, while the title should be taken as it was, she…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Bertles v. . NunanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Pray v. StebbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Jacobs v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Snyder v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Otto F. Stifel's Union Brewing Co. v. SaxySupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  2. Morgan v. Cincinnati InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Way v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Masterman v. MastermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  5. Budwit v. HerrMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API