Legal Opinion

Dettmann v. Page

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 2005PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered December 16, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

Approximately six months after the entry of the order appealed from, the Court of Appeals decided Brill v City of New York (2 NY3d 648 [2004]). Under the standard announced in Brill, leave to file a late motion for summary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Thompson v. New York City Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Rivera v. TorunoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. G4 Noteholder, LLC v. LDC Properties, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Czernicki v. LawniczakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Cohen-Putnam Agency, Ltd. v. Hudson Building Maintenance, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API