Legal Opinion
Brill v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 10, 2004PublishedCited by 439 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
This appeal puts before us a recurring scenario regarding the timing of summary judgment motions that ignores statutory law, disrupts trial calendars, and undermines the goals of orderliness and efficiency in state court practice.
On June 4, 1998, plaintiffs Ona and Maurice Brill brought suit against the City of New York and others for injuries Ona Brill allegedly suffered on February 15, 1998 when she tripped and fell on a public sidewalk in Brooklyn. 1 Following discovery, on June 28, 2001, plaintiffs filed their note of issue and certificate of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Merritt Hill Vineyards Inc. v. Windy Heights Vineyard, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Kihl v. PfefferNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- McCain v. DinkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Gonzalez v. 98 Mag Leasing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Rossi v. Arnot Ogden Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by439 opinions
- Gibbs v. St. Barnabas HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. WeisblumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Miceli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Rivers v. BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Andrea v. Arnone, Hedin, Casker, Kennedy & Drake, Architects & Landscape Architects, P.C.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
434 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.