Legal Opinion
Czernicki v. Lawniczak
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 17, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to partition real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garson, J.), dated February 15, 2005, as denied that branch of his motion which was for leave to serve and file a late motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for leave to serve and file a summary judgment motion more than 120 days after the note of issue was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Gonzalez v. 98 Mag Leasing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Rivera v. TorunoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Espejo v. Hiro Real Estate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Thompson v. New York City Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tower Insurance v. Razy AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Sau Ting Cheng v. Prime Design Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Chung v. RozenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006