Legal Opinion

Van Sant v. American Exp. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 18, 1946No. 9044PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, District Judge.

This is an appeal from the action of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, granting a motion of defendant for a directed verdict in its favor and entering judgment thereon.

In the discussion made herein pertaining to the facts in this case, where the name Edna Frances Van Sant is used, it is to be realized that she is the same person as Frances Van Sant who appears to be the party plaintiff in this proceeding.

The plaintiff, a resident of Washington, D. C., brought her action against the defendant, American Express Company, an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Stacey v. EmerySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Wheeler v. NesbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  5. Simpson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Van Sant v. American Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  3. State, Use and Benefit of Foster v. TurnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Leggett v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  5. Le Baron v. Los Angeles Building & Construction Trades CouncilDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API