Legal Opinion
Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen Fournier
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 18, 2009No. 07-2115, 07-2116, 07-2117UnknownCited by 685 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClay, J., joined by Moore, J.,
KETHLEDGE, J. (pp. 401-07), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part.
SECOND AMENDED OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
In this action, Plaintiff Jeffrey Moldowan (“Moldowan”) asserts a number of claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his rights under the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, as well as claims under Michigan state law. Moldowan’s claims arise out of his arrest, criminal prosecution, conviction, and retrial for the 1990 abduction and brutal sexual assault of Maureen Fournier (“Fournier”). After new evidence came to…
2Cases cited120 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by685 opinions
- Plumhoff v. RickardSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Lucas Burgess v. Gene FischerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Owens v. Baltimore City State's Attorneys OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Sykes v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Tyron Brown v. Lee LucasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
680 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.