Legal Opinion
ESTATE OF MANDARINO v. Mandarino
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 29, 2010No. 04 Civ. 148(GWG)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On September 30 and October 1, 2009, this Court held an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether the statute of limitations applicable to this action should be equitably tolled. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff has not shown that equitable tolling is appropriate in this case. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed on statute of limitations grounds.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
On January 8, 2004, plaintiff James J. Mandarino (“James Sr.”) filed suit against his son, James Mandarino (“James Jr.”), and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kevin Smith v. Michael McGinnis Superintendent, Southport Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Ibinga Bertin v. United States of America, Docket No. 05-4503-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Boos v. RunyonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Knox v. John Varvatos Enters. Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
- Contrera v. LangerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Tipadis v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Webster v. PotterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Zhang v. WeseleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025