Legal Opinion

Contrera v. Langer

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 5, 2017No. 16 Civ. 3851 (LTS) (GWG)PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge

Plaintiffs Usvaldo Contrera, Francisco Lopez, Pedro Batista, Fabian Herrera, and Antonio Reyes—superintendents, handymen, and a porter at residential buildings in Upper Manhattan and the Bronx—filed this action against their purported employers: individuals, investment entities, management entities, and title-holding entities that plaintiffs collectively refer to as “the E & M Enterprise.” Plaintiffs move to have this case conditionally approved as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 eh…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Shillingford v. Astra Home Care, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Contrera v. LangerDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Abundiz Carranza v. VBFS, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  4. Aguilo v. Vails Gate Cleaners Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. Aliyeva v. Diamond BracesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API