Legal Opinion
Tipadis v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided January 8, 2018No. 16 Civ. 9864(GWG)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff Anastasia Tipadis brings this action pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner") denying her request to withdraw her approved application for retirement insurance benefits ("RIB"). The Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c).1 For the reasons stated below, the Commissioner's motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
On August 11, 2011, Tipadis allegedly filed an…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Brault v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Burgess v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davila v. LangDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Clinton v. HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Dos Santos v. Assurant, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Freeman v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Hunter v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.