Anamizu v. City of Honolulu
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LEVINSON, J.
This case involves the validity of sections 17-6.2 (d) (1) (aa) and 17-6.2 (d) (1) (cc) of Honolulu, Hawaii, Ordinance 2541, December 24, 1964. The provisions in question set forth the requirements which must be met by electrical contractors who seek permission to practice their profession in the City and County of Honolulu. The appel-lees are all supervising electricians and each holds a current state electrical contractor’s license, issued by the Hawaii Contractors License Board pursuant to HES § 444-4. During the normal work week they are employed on a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Hansen v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1968
- 7-Eleven, Incorporated v. McClainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Agnew v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- McKenzie v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by18 opinions
- Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Pacific International Services Corp v. HuripHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Alika Atay v. County of MauiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Hawaii Government Employees' Ass'n v. County of MauiHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. MedeirosHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.