Legal Opinion

State v. Medeiros

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1999No. 20778PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

LEVINSON, J.

The respondents-appellants Roy Amemiya, Jr., in his capacity as Director of Finance for the City and County of Honolulu, and Peter B. Carlisle, in his capacity as Prosecuting Attorney, (hereinafter collectively' referred to as “the city”) appeal from the order of .the first circuit court enjoining the city from implementing or enforcing the provisions of chapter 6, article 52 of the Revised Ordinances of the City and County of Honolulu (ROCCH) (Supp.1998) (hereinafter, the ordinance). 1 The city argues that the circuit court erred because (1) the city is…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. National Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. DudoitHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Chun v. Bd. of Trustees of ERSHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. OrtizHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API