Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Wilson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1930No. 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PERRY, C. J.

This is a submission under sections 2371 to "2374, R. L. 1925, upon a statement of agreed facts of a controversy relating to the validity of Act 96, L. 1929. That Act creates a board to be known as the “Board of Water Supply of the City and County of Honolulu,” to consist of seven members, of whom five are to be appointive and of whom two “shall always be the persons who for the time being shall be the legal incumbents of the offices of the superintendent of public works of the Territory and the chief engineer of the department of public works of the City…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Downes v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KantnerHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Stewart v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Koike v. Board of Water SupplyHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Anamizu v. City of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  5. De Mello v. Auditor City CountyHawaii Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API