Ziols v. Rice County Board of Commissioners
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from a writ of mandamus and denial of a motion for a new trial in which the district court ordered the county board of commissioners to reconsider its redistricting plan and to adopt a plan that complies with statutory and constitutional mandates. Appellant board contends (a) the district court erred as a matter of law in its redistricting decision and (b) because the district court had already ordered the county board to proceed using the challenged plan for the 2002 elections, it no longer had jurisdiction over the mandamus petition. We affirm, holding…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Brown v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Houck v. EASTERN CARVER COUNTY SCHOOLSCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Fay v. St. Louis County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004