Legal Opinion

Houck v. EASTERN CARVER COUNTY SCHOOLS

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 17, 2010No. A09-1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

Appellants argue that the district court erred by denying a writ of mandamus to compel an Eastern Carver County school-board election on November 3, 2009. Because appellants are not entitled to mandamus relief, we affirm.

FACTS

On April 23, 2009, the school board of respondent Eastern Carver County Schools adopted a resolution to transition school-board general elections from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years and created a transition plan for that purpose. Discussions to transition school-board elections from odd-numbered to even-numbered years had taken place…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. In Re McCaskillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peter K Butler v. Shari MooreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  2. The Centennial Fire Fighters Relief Association v. The City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County Auditor, Jonell Sawyer in her official capacity, Minnesota Secretary of State, Steve Simon, in his official capacityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API