Legal Opinion

Fay v. St. Louis County Board of Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 2004No. A03-1443Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

On appeal from the district court’s invalidation of the county board’s redistricting plan and subsequent appointment of a redistricting commission, appellant county board argues that a redistricting plan with a ten-percent-or-less-population deviation among districts is prima facie valid and may be implemented with no justification by the board. Because we find no error in the district court’s findings and conclusion that the board failed to satisfy the standards of the Minnesota county-redistricting statute, we affirm the court’s determination that the plan is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Abate v. MundtSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY BY THE SPECIAL COMPENSATION FUND v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. McIntosh v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API