Legal Opinion

Suezaki v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1962No. S. F. No. 20975PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Petitioners Henry Suezaki and Grace Suezaki are plaintiffs, and Stanley L. Crawford and Golden State Leasing Company (the real parties in interest herein) are defendants in an action for personal injuries pending in the respondent court. Defendants’ attorney hired an investigator to take motion pictures of plaintiff (Henry) without the latter’s knowledge. By the use of interrogatories, answers to which, over defendants’ objections, were compelled by the trial court, plaintiffs discovered the existence of the films, that they had been taken by an independent investigator, and delivered by him…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Oceanside Union School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Holm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Oceanside Union School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. City of San Jose v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Coy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API