Legal Opinion

Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. Alvey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Knox Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

In this case but a single error is assigned. The action was upon an account for work and labor, the appellant being the defendant and the appellee the plaintiff. The appellant answered in three paragraphs: i. The general denial. 2. Payment. The third paragraph alleges that suit was commenced by one James C. Montgomery in attachment against the appellee, before.a justice of the peace of Hamilton county, in the state of Ohio; that in said proceeding the appellant was summoned as garnishee, and appeared and answered, stating the sum that the appellant owed the appellee; that by the order of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beard v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Crake v. CrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Harmon v. BirchardIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Schoppenhast v. BollmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Richardson v. HickmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Earl v. MatheneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Newman v. ManningIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Northern Indiana Railway Co. v. Lincoln National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Taylor v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Baltimore, Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API