Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Elliott

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Marion Civil Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

The sufficiency of the complaint in this case, to which a demurrer was sustained, is the only question for decision. The facts averred in the complaint are the following :

On the 13th day of .January, 1866, Stout and another sued Hezekiah, in the Marion Common Pleas, and at the same time sued out an attachment in their action. On the 22d day of January, in the same year, the sheriff' seized the personal property of the defendant therein. On the 25th day of the same month, Hezekiah, with Elliott as his surety, executed an undertaking, payable to Stout and another, with condition as follows:

“Now…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hardin v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Beard v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. State ex rel. Biddinger v. ManlyIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Perkins v. BraggIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Beech v. AbbottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Woods v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Fee v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Little v. MundellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. First National Bank v. Denbrae Sheep Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
  5. First National Bank v. Denbrae Sheep Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API