Legal Opinion

Baltimore, Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. Taylor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 7996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Morris, C.

On the 18th day of December, 1873, Thomas H. B. Teeples commenced a suit against Johnson Virtue, to recover $136.37 for work and labor. Teeples filed, with his complaint, an affidavit stating the nature of his cause of ac-^ tion, that it was just, the amount he ought to recover, and *26that Virtue was not a resident of the State. Upon this affidavit he procured an attachment to be issued against the property of Virtue, filing an undertaking with surety for the due prosecution of the attachment proceedings. He also filed an affidavit that the appellant was indebted to Virtue, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kesler v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Jenks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Whitney v. LehmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Foster v. DryfusIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Kimball v. LoomisIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Creed v. GilmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Commercial Credit Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. Commercial Credit Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. Schnull v. McPheetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API