Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Hickman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1864PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Jay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit to foreclose a mortgage. The defendant answered:

1. The general denial.

2. Payment.,

3. That Richardson, the plaintiff, was indebted to Alfred McDaniel, in the State of Ohio; that McDaniel sued Richardson, in that State, by attachment against his property, he being a non-resident, before a justice of the peace; that Daban Hickman, the male defendant, was garnisheed, in that proceeding, as a debtor of Richardson, and ordered to pay, and did pay, on said order, to the justice, 98 dollars and 70 cents, &c.

A demurrer to this answer was overruled. Issues were formed and tried, and the defendants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crake v. CrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Harmon v. BirchardIndiana Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stevens v. St. Mary's Training SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Emery v. RoyalIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Earl v. MatheneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Newman v. ManningIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. AlveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API