Reading Coach Co. v. Public Service Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
The residents of Reiffton filed a complaint with the Public Service Commission averring that the Reading Coach Company charged a higher rate for bus transportation from Reading to Reiffton than it charged for similar transportation between Reading and other suburban communities at a greater distance, and requesting that the Reading-Reiffton fare be reduced. Respondent’s answer admitted that the situation was as set forth in the complaint, but alleged that its Reading-Reiffton fare was “in all respects just, reasonable, non-discriminatory, and otherwise in conformity with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Portland Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- American Lime & Stone Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co. v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Carpenter v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Harrisburg Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.