Legal Opinion

United States v. Stephanidis

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 24, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion made by the plaintiff to dismiss the first and second counterclaims set forth in the answer of the defendant Stephen D. Stephanidis, on the ground that the court has not jurisdiction of said counterclaims and for summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the relief demanded in the complaint, pursuant to Rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice of the state of New York, on the ground that the defendants Stephen D. Stephanidis and John D. Stephanidis have no defense in this action, and that the answers of said defendants are frivolous and sham.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. Bank of the MetropolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  3. United States v. Norwegian Barque TheklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Gratiot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  5. United States v. WilkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1821

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Molesworth v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  2. Danforth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. United States v. ContiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  4. United States v. United States Tin CorporationDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1957
  5. Graske v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API