Legal Opinion

United States v. United States Tin Corporation

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided January 26, 1957No. A-4113PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGE, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action to foreclose real and chattel mortgages executed by the defendant corporation as security for payment of 56 promissory notes aggregating $2,841,258, alleging default in the payment thereof in the sum of $2,760,-024.07, plus interest thereon. Defendant by its answer admits the execution of the notes and mortgages, admits partial payment only of principal and interest, but denies any balance due and owing by it, and by way of “cross-complaint” sets up three defenses or claims against the Government, which are in reality counterclaims and will…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Nassau Smelting & Refining Works, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. United States v. SilvertonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  5. United States v. Nipissing Mines Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blessing v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. United States v. Sherman Gardens CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1967
  3. United States v. Buffalo Coal Mining CompanyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1959
  4. United States v. Ein Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  5. United States v. Aleutian Homes, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API