Legal Opinion

Peele v. Wilson County Board of Education

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1982No. 817SC680PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Plaintiffs contend that the manifest intention of the grantors in the deed to the school board limited the conveyance to a grant *558of less than fee simple and that “the trial judge erred by failing to consider all parts of the deed in determining the estate conveyed.” Plaintiffs argue that the plain and express words indicate that the Peeles intended to grant a fee on condition subsequent.

Assuming, arguendo, that we adopt plaintiffs’ position that the conditional provision in the deed must be given weight as an expression of the grantors’ intent, we cannot agree that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Artis v. . ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Smith v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Whetsell v. JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Joyner v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Kennedy v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ferrero Construction Co. v. Dennis Rourke Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Resources Planning Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Brough v. FoleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  4. Dennis Rourke Corp. v. Ferrero Construction Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Village of Pinehurst v. Regional Investments of Moore, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API