Legal Opinion
Secan v. Dunbar
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 9, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4654PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
139 Ariz. 503 (1983)
679 P.2d 526
Frank D. SECAN and Martha Secan, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Appellants,
v.
Art DUNBAR, a single man; Becky Gogle, a single woman; Glen Helm, a single man; James McConnell, a single man; HMDG Investments, a partnership; CDO, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Defendants/Appellees.
No. 2 CA-CIV 4654.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.
December 9, 1983.
Rehearing Denied January 25, 1984.
Review Denied April 10, 1984.
Molloy, Jones, Donahue, Trachta, Childers & Mallamo, P.C. by Gary F. Howard, Tucson, for plaintiffs/appellants.
Whitehill, Stolkin, Karp, West, Weiss &…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- O'HARE v. GriesmerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Lemons v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Bangs v. HornickU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1887
- Young v. YeatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Secan v. DunbarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- L.K. Comstock & Co. v. United Engineers & Constructors Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Sing v. John L. Scott, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Ngan Tang Nguyen v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Horizon Corp. v. Westcor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- QUEIROZ v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.