Sing v. John L. Scott, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
A jury found that John L. Scott, Inc., violated the Consumer Protection Act (CPA) and judgment was entered in favor of Sing, a prospective purchaser. On appeal, Scott claims that the evidence was insufficient to establish a CPA violation; its actions were exempt from the CPA; and the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees and in instructing the jury. We hold that Scott is not exempt from the CPA because the conduct of its agents was not specifically permitted by any statute. We also hold that there was sufficient evidence that Scott violated the CPA, and there was no instructional error.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sing v. John L. Scott, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Sing v. John L. Scott, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Durland v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Martini v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
- Martini v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.