Legal Opinion

Young v. Yeates

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1922No. 23,106PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Plaintiff is the owner of an eight-apartment building in Minneapolis. Defendants are rental agents. By a written contract defendants were authorized “to rent, sign leases, collect and receipt for all rents and to take full charge of all matters pertaining” to the building for one year from November 1, 1916. They were to retain 5 per cent of the rents collected for their services. The writing provides that the agents exercise due and reasonable diligence in all matters, which is no more than the law exacts in the absence *368of such a clause. Defendants took charge olf the building as agreed,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yeates v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Secan v. DunbarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Secan v. DunbarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API