Legal Opinion

Mayor of Savannah v. Williamson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 15, 1918No. 9611PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for damages; from Chatham superior court—Judge Meldrim. February 8, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

1. Where, as in this ease, damages are sought on account of injury to certain subdivisions of a 40-acre tract of land, alleged to have been caused by a change in the grade of abutting streets, and the petition fails to allege the market value of the entire tract prior to and after the grading, there can be no recovery; and, so far as the instant case is concerned,, this doctrine (right or wrong) has crystallized into unalterable'law. See former decision, 19 Ga. App. 784 (92 S. E. 291). It was there said: “If a plaintiff could select certain lots out of an entire tract belonging to him and sue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Hurt v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Williamson v. Mayor of SavannahCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Roney v. McCallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stansell & Rape Bros. v. City of McDonoughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Polk v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API