Legal Opinion

Hurt v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 26, 1897PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Reid. City court of Atlanta. July term, 1896.

1Opinion of the Court

.Lumpkin; Presiding Justice.

This was an action brought by Mrs. Hurt in 1893 against the City of Atlanta, by which she sought to recover damages alleged to have been occasioned to certain realty owned by her, consisting of a lot with a three-story brick store thereon fronting on Forsyth street. The nature of the case will be readily apprehended from the following condensed statennent of the facts.

The city in 1892 had, under express legislative authority, caused to be constructed longitudinally in this street a ' bridge which spanned a number of railway tracks. The width ■of the bridge…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chicago v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Pause v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Smith v. Floyd CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. City of Atlanta v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  5. Streyer v. Georgia Southern & Florida RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Woodside v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  2. Marietta Chair Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Dougherty County v. HornsbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Brown v. Atlanta Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Morris v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API