Legal Opinion

Polk v. City of Memphis

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 31, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHejlskell, J.

This is a suit by plaintiffs, O. B. Polk and others, seeking a recovery against the City of Memphis and the several railroad companies mentioned as defendants, for damages to the property of the plaintiffs by reason of the change of grade of Poplar Avenue in the' City of Memphis in the construction of the Aulon or P'oplar Avenue viaduct. The purpose of this viaduct was to separate the grade of Poplar Avenue and that of the several railroads mentioned, at Aulon. The declaration filed in the case is as follows:

“The plaintiffs sue the defendants for $60,000 as defendants caused to be constructed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McLemore v. Charleston & Memphis RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  2. City of Shawneetown v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Union Railway Co. v. HuntonTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Nelson v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Green v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Love v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Maryville Housing Authority v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  3. Earle v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
  4. Fagg v. Benton Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API