Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Hebeisen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 10, 1984No. C9-83-1615PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
This is an appeal challenging the probate court’s appointment of Gerald Rekow as guardian of the person and estate of Math-ilda Schmidt. Appellant alleges the court had insufficient evidence to conclude that Rekow was the most suitable and best qualified because Rekow was not present at the time of his appointment, and because an independent person was not really nec essary since a family member was best suited and available.
We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Elford Schmidt petitioned Carver County Probate Court seeking the appointment of a general guardian for the person and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Guardianship of StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- In Re Guardianship of DahmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- In Re Guardianship of the Estate & Person of SchoberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Hartmann v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Leslie v. Minneapolis Society of Fine ArtsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Matter of Guardianship of RichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Guardianship of KowalskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Gaither v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- In RE CONSERVATORSHIP OF ANDERSON v. LasenNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Conservatorship of LundgaardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.