Legal Opinion

In Re Guardianship of Kowalski

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 1986No. C1-85-1595PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from an order confirming the appointment of a guardian and vesting him with full statutory powers, including the power to determine visitation. Appeal is made by the ward through her court-appointed counsel. Karen Thompson who originally filed for appointment as the ward's guardian also asserts her position in this matter. Appellant and Thompson claim the trial court (1) abused its discretion in naming the ward’s father as guardian, (2) erred in vesting the guardian with the power to determine visitation because such power is overly restrictive of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Price v. SheppardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Schmidt v. HebeisenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re Guardianship of DahmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. In Re Guardianship of the Estate & Person of SchoberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Guardianship & Conservatorship of ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Guardianship/Conservatorship of B.K.J.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In Re Conservatorship of KocembaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. In re Conservatorship of EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Guardianship/Conservatorship of R.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API