Legal Opinion

In Re Guardianship of Dahmen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 1934No. 29,980PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 256 N.W. 891. This is an appeal from a judgment entered in and by the district court of Morrison county affirming an order of the probate court of that county appointing respondent general guardian of Mary Dahmen, who is the mother of appellant and respondent.

Mary Dahmen is a widow and at the time of trial in the court below was past 80 years of age. In October, 1932, she suffered a stroke which partially affected her speech and left her unable to move about. She can utter but a few simple words and is to all practical purposes unable to carry on a conversation except that she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Swick v. SheridanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Prokosch v. BrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Wilkowske v. LynchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Hallenberg v. HallenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Restoration to Capacity of MastersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. In Re Guardianship of StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Schmidt v. HebeisenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Hartmann v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. In Re Guardianship of KowalskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API