In RE CONSERVATORSHIP OF ANDERSON v. Lasen
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.
Barbara J. Lasen and Paul S. Lasen appeal from the county court’s appointment of Platte Valley National Bank as conservator for the estate of Robert P. Anderson, a protected person. Barbara and Paul complain that a conservatorship was not necessary because they were acting as Robert’s attorneys in fact, but that if it was necessary, then they had priority for appointment under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2639(b) (Cum. Supp. 2000). We affirm the appointment of Platte Valley National Bank as conservator because under § 30-2639(c), it was in Robert’s best interests to have a disinterested third party…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cheloha v. ChelohaNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Guardianship and Conservatorship of SimNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Fletcher v. MathewNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Mischke v. MischkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Schmidt v. HebeisenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- First Colony Life Insurance v. GerdesNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- PLATTE VALLEY NAT. BANK & TRUST v. LasenNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services v. GilmoreNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re Guardianship of HartwigNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
- Lasen v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.