Legal Opinion
San Franciscans for Reasonable Growth v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 24, 1984No. Docket Nos. AO19128, AO19130, AO19126, AO19129PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, J.
I. Statement of the Case
Plaintiff, San Franciscans for Reasonable Growth (SFRG), appeals from judgments denying its four petitions for writs of mandate compelling defendant, San Francisco Planning Commission (Commission), to set aside resolutions that certified four Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) and to void the permits that allowed the Real Parties in Interest (RPIs) to begin construction on the projects evaluated in the EIRs. The basis for SRFG’s writ petitions was that, through its agencies, defendant City and County of San Francisco (City) had violated the California…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Rural Landowners Assn. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- San Francisco Ecology Center v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of HanfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Communities for a Better Environment v. California Resources AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.