Legal Opinion

Olson v. Neale

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 30, 1977No. 1 CA-CIV 3193PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

This is an action for broker’s commission arising from the sale of real property. The principal question raised by the parties on appeal is whether an extant broker’s listing agreement is a condition precedent to recovery of a sales commission. We hold that a valid agreement must be in force.

The facts of this case are as follows: On March 6, 1965, Gilbert and Hedwig Olson, gave to William G. Neale and Martha H. Neale, d/b/a Neale & Associates (hereinafter “Neale”) a written non-exclusive listing to sell the Olson ranch. The listing provided for a “broker’s commission,”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Garver v. ThomanArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Gray v. KohlhaseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Fornara v. WolpeArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Leadville Mining Co. v. HemphillArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Fink v. WilliamsonArizona Supreme Court · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Red Carpet-Barry & Associates, Inc. v. Apex Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  2. Realty Associates v. Valley National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Young v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Insurance Agencies Co. v. WeaverArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Lombardo v. AlbuCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API