Young v. Rose
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
DOWNIE, Judge.
¶ 1 Julie Young appeals the dismissal of her breach of contract action against Jason and Jordan Rose (collectively, “the Roses”).1 The superior court ruled that Young’s real estate employment agreement with the Roses was unenforceable because she did not sign it. We agree that Young was statutorily required to sign the agreement and that it is unenforceable without her signature. We therefore affirm that aspect of the superior court’s ruling.
¶ 2 The superior court also rejected Young’s contention that she signed the agreement electronically. In doing so, however, the court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Cullen v. Auto-Owners InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Dube v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Collins v. StockwellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Collins v. StockwellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Belen Loan Investors, LLC v. Myers, Baumgardner, Los Luna HighlandsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Ck Family Irrevocable v. My HomeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Date Street Capital, LLC v. Clearcover Insurance Company ...Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
- Lozano v. PaccoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020