Legal Opinion
Panicali v. Connecticut State Board of Labor Relations
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 10, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKihg, J.
The plaintiff operated a small restaurant and bar in Bridgeport in which seven persons were employed. They consisted of two bartenders, who were the plaintiff’s brother and Alex Kasmin; three kitchen helpers, who were the plaintiff’s father and two women; and two waitresses, who were the plaintiff’s mother and sister. Sometime before June 25, 1956, the Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union, Local No. 288, A.F.L. C.I.O., hereinafter referred to as the union, held a meeting at which it decided to try to obtain collective bargaining contracts for all businesses in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Franks Bros. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bradford Dyeing Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Howell Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. Chicago Apparatus Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MayellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Town of Winchester v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Marquis v. DrostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Bisogno v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Puro v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.