Legal Opinion
Tymoshenko v. Firtash
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 2014No. 11-CV-2794 (KMW)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge:
The Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) in this action alleges that several Ukrainian defendants, led by businessman Dmytro Firtash, financed a domestic racketeering enterprise (the “U.S. Enterprise”) conducted primarily by defendant United States citizens and corporations. Plaintiff Yulia Tymoshenko is the former Prime Minister of Ukraine and a longstanding critic of Firtash’s energy company, RosU-krEnergo (“RUE”). Money laundered by the U.S. Enterprise was allegedly used to finance Tymoshenko’s “persecution” in Ukraine, in retaliation for her…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Westchester County Independence Party v. AstorinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Town of Islip v. DatreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Flexborrow LLC v. TD Auto Finance LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- In re Express Scripts/Anthem Erisa Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- BC Liquidating, LLC v. Weinstein (In re BC Funding, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.