Legal Opinion
United States v. Nathan Lumbard
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 7, 2013No. 12-1209PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLLIER, District Judge.
Whether purchasing personal information from its possessor for subsequent use in fraudulent activity constitutes aggravated identity theft within the purview of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(l) is the key issue in this appeal. Appellant Nathan Lumbard (“Lumbard”) argues it is not, and also argues his sentence is procedurally and substantively unreasonable. Finding neither argument has merit, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
I
On June 24, 2009, Lumbard was arrested by state authorities in Michigan on two warrants, which included charges of breaking and entering,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. VonnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Flores-Figueroa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Henry A. BosticCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Herrera-ZunigaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. Russell CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Troy HockenberryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. David MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Phillip ZabawaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Okechukwo OtuyaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.