Legal Opinion

United States v. Troy Hockenberry

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 19, 2013No. 12-3720, 12-3757PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SARGUS, District Judge.

Defendants-Appellants Troy Hocken-berry (“Hockenberry”) and Billy Gray, Jr. (“Gray”) (collectively “Defendants”) appeal their judgments and sentences in the district court for being felons in possession of firearms in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Following the district court’s denial of their motions to suppress evidence, Hockenberry and Gray—who were eo-Defendants before the district court—pleaded guilty to beings felons in possession of firearms. After finding that both Defendants were armed career criminals pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), the district…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Alison Taylor v. City of SaginawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Terry AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. Carlos Rendon v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Richard MathisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Nathaniel OzierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API