United States v. Troy Hockenberry
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SARGUS, District Judge.
Defendants-Appellants Troy Hocken-berry (“Hockenberry”) and Billy Gray, Jr. (“Gray”) (collectively “Defendants”) appeal their judgments and sentences in the district court for being felons in possession of firearms in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Following the district court’s denial of their motions to suppress evidence, Hockenberry and Gray—who were eo-Defendants before the district court—pleaded guilty to beings felons in possession of firearms. After finding that both Defendants were armed career criminals pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), the district…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Alison Taylor v. City of SaginawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Terry AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Carlos Rendon v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Richard MathisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Nathaniel OzierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.