Legal Opinion

United States v. David Miller

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 30, 2013No. 12-6501PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Defendant David Miller appeals his convictions by a jury of two counts of making false statements to a bank, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 (Counts One and Four), and two counts of aggravated identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A (Counts Two and Three). Miller argues that he is entitled to a reversal of all convictions because on Count One, he was subjected to a prejudicial variance at trial and the district court did not, sua sponte, give the jury a specific unanimity instruction; on Counts Two and Three, he did not “use” a means of identification…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Watson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lynne Donovan v. FirstCredit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. DavilaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. WeddCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Christopher EatonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Kathy MedlockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API