Legal Opinion
Emergent Capital Investment Management, LLC v. Stonepath Group, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 16, 2002No. 00 CIV. 7723(RWS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Stonepath Group, Inc. (“Sto-nepath”), previously known as Net Value Holdings, Inc. (“NETV”); Andrew Panzo (“Panzo”); and Lee Hansen (“Hansen”) have moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the second amended complaint of plaintiff Emergent Capital Investment Management LLC (“Emergent”).
For the following reasons, that motion is granted.
Facts
The facts underlying this dispute were described in greater detail in Emergent Capital Investment Management v. Stonepath Group, Inc., 165 F.Supp.2d 615 (S.D.N.Y.2001), familiarity with which is presumed.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Research Reports Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- In Re Merrill Lynch & Co. Research Reports Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- FIH, LLC v. Foundation Capital Partners, LLC.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Petedge, Inc. v. GargDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Consolidated Edison, Inc. v. Northeast UtilitiesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.