Legal Opinion

Degnan v. Olson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 22, 1949PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In this negligence action for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff when she was struck while crossing a highway by an automobile owned by one defendant and driven by the other, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants which the court refused to set aside. The plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment is confined to claimed errors in the court’s charge to the jury. Many of the oral objections to the charge repeated written requests duly filed. Under Practice Book § 156, failure to charge in accordance with a written request affords a ground of appeal without further objection…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marley v. New England Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. Puza v. HamwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. Peterson v. MeehanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Caschetto v. Silliman Godfrey Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Ghent v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mei v. Alterman Transport Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  2. Goodmaster v. HouserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. MacK v. ClinchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. Hartlin v. CodySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  5. Drobish v. PetronziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API