Legal Opinion

Muse v. Cermak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 1993No. 3256PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order granting appellee’s motion to preclude evidence of liability. Appellants, Jerry L. Cermak and Falcon Transport, present the following issues for our review:

1. Whether the trial court erred in accepting [appellee’s] collateral estoppel argument since the inter-company agreement which provided for arbitration specifically limited the conclusiveness of arbitration decisions to the claim submitted to the panel and set forth that the decision was not res judicata nor did it have any legal or moral effect on any other claim or suit arising out of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Pittsburgh v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Incollingo v. MaurerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Emlenton Area Municipal Authority v. MilesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Johnson v. Pennsylvania National Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Lindstrom v. Pennswood VillageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Randall v. Bank One National Ass'n (In Re Randall)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Quaciari v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Harvey v. Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Shiffer v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API