Legal Opinion

Lindstrom v. Pennswood Village

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 4, 1992No. 2862PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, President Judge.

In this appeal from the August 27,1991, order sustaining the preliminary objections of appellee Pennswood Village, appellants Carl A. Lindstrom and Virginia K. Lindstrom, husband and wife, contend that the trial court erred in dismissing all but one of their causes of action, and granting leave to amend within thirty days as to the remaining claim. After a careful review of the record and the law, we disagree with appellants. Accordingly, we affirm the order sustaining appellee’s demurrer in this case.

This action was commenced on April 4, 1991, when appellants filed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Kuriger v. CramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Warren v. GreenfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Ganassi v. Buchanan Ingersoll, P.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Volunteer Firemen's Insurance Services v. Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance AgencySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Muse v. CermakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Ardrey Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of DecaturSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. City of Philadelphia v. N. Park Development LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. DARBY v. 120 NORTHAMPTON, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API